{"id":220,"date":"2008-12-02T03:58:05","date_gmt":"2008-12-02T03:58:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/?p=220"},"modified":"2012-02-27T14:22:57","modified_gmt":"2012-02-27T14:22:57","slug":"kitty-and-the-midnight-hour","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/?p=220","title":{"rendered":"Kitty and the Midnight Hour"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><em>Kitty and the Midnight Hour<\/em> by Carrie Vaughn<\/h3>\n<p>We had seventeen people, the  largest attendance in years, for  this discussion at A. T.\u2019s house. Another  reader submitted comments by  email. Our topic was <em>Kitty and the Midnight Hour<\/em>, the first  novel by Carrie Vaughn. The  story is about Kitty, the host of a radio  call-in show devoted to the  supernatural, who herself is a werewolf.  Fourteen of us started the book, and  all finished it.<\/p>\n<p>One person was initially dubious  about this book, and only read  it because the group had chosen it. He was  surprised and delighted by  it. He said it was better<!--more--> written than most first  novels. He loved the  story and enjoyed the characters, although he didn\u2019t  identify with  anyone. He thought the depiction of werewolf pack dynamics was  original  and worthy of discussion. He said the story flowed, was well-paced,   and nothing seemed forced.<\/p>\n<p>Another commented that she reads  about one werewolf book a  year, and this book was better than most. She was  pleased at the  omission of the \u201cicky romance\u201d elements that she\u2019d feared. She  thought  the author had pulled off a good character arc for Kitty, and   appreciated how Kitty stood up to dominant men.<\/p>\n<p>We generally felt that the  strongest parts of the book were the  \u201con air\u201d sequences. \u00a0The talk show format was convincing, and the   author did a great job of conveying ideas and action almost entirely  through  dialog. Kitty\u2019s interview of an author who wrote a book on the  supernatural was  particularly fun.<\/p>\n<p>One reader thought the book was  fast-paced fun, but wished the author had been bolder with the sexual element  of the book.<\/p>\n<p>One member of the group is a former  college radio disc jockey.  She felt the radio sequences were good, and  completely related to the  weird callers late at night. She thought the book was  a good popcorn  read. She felt the vampire element of the book was unnecessary,   particularly since many other authors handle vampires better.<\/p>\n<p>There were some negative comments.  One person felt it had  \u201cfirst novel issues\u201d and used too much of the writing  approach of  \u201ctell, not show\u201d. Another dismissed the book as \u201cjust another   paranormal romance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The most negative review came from  one who reads a lot of  paranormal romance and had lobbied heavily for us to  read more such  books. She felt the character development and plot were bad, and  was  disappointed and offended by the male characters who she felt were   stereotypical and shallow.<\/p>\n<p>Near the end, we talked about other  vampire novels the group had read in the past. Roger Zelazny\u2019s <em>A Night in the Lonesome October<\/em> featured  an all-animal cast, including Larry Talbot, the werewolf from  the classic  Universal monster films. And Wen Spencer\u2019s\u00a0 <em>Alien Taste<\/em> featured werewolf-like  aliens.<\/p>\n<p>Overall most of us were pleasantly  pleased with <em>Kitty and the Midnight Hour<\/em>,  and several of us plan to read more in the series. At the end of the meeting,  we picked new books for the reading  schedule.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kitty and the Midnight Hour by Carrie Vaughn We had seventeen people, the largest attendance in years, for this discussion at A. T.\u2019s house. Another reader submitted comments by email. Our topic was Kitty and the Midnight Hour, the first novel by Carrie Vaughn. The story is about Kitty, the host of a radio call-in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=220"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":592,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions\/592"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}