{"id":1024,"date":"2001-03-20T03:23:21","date_gmt":"2001-03-20T03:23:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/?p=1024"},"modified":"2012-04-25T03:24:02","modified_gmt":"2012-04-25T03:24:02","slug":"the-marriage-of-sticks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/?p=1024","title":{"rendered":"The Marriage of Sticks"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><em>T<\/em><em>he Marriage of Sticks<\/em> by Jonathan             Carroll<\/h3>\n<p>This meeting had fourteen attendees. Eight had read the             book, and the rest were there to socialize.             Additionally, one person had e-mailed in comments. The             subject of this discussion was Jonathan Carroll&#8217;s             <em>The Marriage of Sticks<\/em>. Several people in the             group were longtime fans of Carroll&#8217;s prior work             (including <em>The Land of Laughs<\/em> and <em>Outside the             Dog Museum<\/em>) and had been trying for years to get             one of his books on our reading list. The mainstream             packaging of his books, combined with their tendency to             go out of print quickly, had thwarted those efforts             until now. <em>The Marriage of Sticks<\/em> is an urban             fantasy novel about Miranda Romanac, a young woman who             owns a used bookstore in New York City. The book starts             out reading like a mainstream novel, but gradually some             weird stuff happens and Miranda discovers disturbing             truths about herself.<\/p>\n<p>Many of us liked Carroll&#8217;s evocative prose and the             quirky, surreal world he depicted. We liked one of the             supporting characters, an offbeat small-town sheriff. A             couple of people in the group who&#8217;d read Carroll&#8217;s             previous book (<em>Kissing the Beehive<\/em>) and next             book (<em>The Wooden Sea<\/em>) said that this book             provided some<!--more--> useful bridging material between the two.             Unfortunately that&#8217;s about all the positive comments             there were.<\/p>\n<p>We generally disliked this book. We wanted more to             happen. The plot is filled with cliches, with a high             school reunion being one of the low points. The             directionless story provides no emotional payoff at the             end. Carroll did a poor job of presenting a female             protagonist. Miranda started out seeming a little dull,             and as we learned more about her she seemed even more             boring. The men in the book all considered Miranda a             &#8220;selfish bitch&#8221;, and we couldn&#8217;t see why. Her most             selfish act was refusing to sleep with men she didn&#8217;t             like. Throughout the meeting, several people commented             that Sean Stewart (author of <em>Mockingbird<\/em> and             <em>Galveston<\/em>) is much better at depicting women.             Some people who&#8217;d liked Carroll&#8217;s earlier books were             wondering if they&#8217;d been mistaken. One person said that             she&#8217;d been tempted to throw the book across the room             several times, and only held back so that the book             would be in good condition to sell back to Crime &amp;             Space.<\/p>\n<p>We concluded that <em>The Marriage of Sticks<\/em> is a             poor entry-level book for a reader who wants to try             Jonathan Carroll. It offers little for established             Carroll fans and nothing for new readers.<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8212; A. T. Campbell, III<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Marriage of Sticks by Jonathan Carroll This meeting had fourteen attendees. Eight had read the book, and the rest were there to socialize. Additionally, one person had e-mailed in comments. The subject of this discussion was Jonathan Carroll&#8217;s The Marriage of Sticks. Several people in the group were longtime fans of Carroll&#8217;s prior work [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1024"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1024\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1026,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1024\/revisions\/1026"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fact.org\/reading\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}